Re: [PATCH] Even more minimal reimplementation of errors.c within read-md.c

[Bernd Schmidt]

On 12/03/2016 12:07 AM, David Malcolm wrote:

seen_error is already implemented in the "real" diagnostic subsystem,
and would be a clash: we want a way to determine if read-md.c's
implementation of error_at was called.  Hence it seems simplest to
conditionally add a copy of the "have_error" global to read-md.c.
Thoughts?

Yeah, ok. I think this area could be cleaned up but with this minimal 
patch it's become somewhat of an orthogonal problem.


Bernd