On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 08:32:01PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > This is a work in progress with the goal of fixing the first > > > problem and similar ones by calling simplify_set after > > > change_zero_ext to get rid of the overly complex code. That > > > works fine in principle, but replaces back the (and (lshiftrt > > > ...) ...) that change_zero_ext generates back into zero_extract > > > form. Fiddling with simplify_set and make_compound_operation* a > > > bit, trying to suppress undoing the transformations that > > > change_zero_ext has just done, resulted in the (unfinished) > > > patch. > > > > This we cannot do: we cannot call simplify* here. The problem is > > combine can reuse the old target reg of an insn it combines but the > > simplify* will still see the old nonzero_bits for that register. > > > > The best solution to that is to not reuse registers at all, but that > > will have to wait until GCC 8. > > > > > As it's not clear to me whether this is a valid approach I'd > > > appreciate any advice on the patch or alternative ways of doing > > > that. > > > > Currently I just handle all cases manually in change_zero_ext, but > > that is not nice at all for your case. > > You mean, inside change_zero_ext just look for for any "(and > (subreg (zero_extract ...)))" where the zero_extract gets replaced > later and the two and masks can be merged into one, and do that > manually? I'll try that.
You can also code those patterns (in your MD) as the zero_extract form, if that works nicer? This is for RNSBG, right, so you also need to handles RXSBG and ROSBG, maybe you can do those in the same pattern? Segher
