On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:07:29AM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> If your implementation diagnoses the common cases exercised by the
> tests I wrote I have no objection to it (not that objecting would
> do me any good).
Your tests all pass with the patch I've posted, we can surely add further
ones if needed.
Anyway, I think I've posted what I wanted to say on the topic, so let's
wait for others to decide what we want to do, somebody has to ack either of
the patches (or some other, or request reversion).
Jakub
