On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:31 AM, FX <fxcoud...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I don't understand. Why would it imply a 1:1 mapping of release series >> with major ABI versions? > > OK, I thought you meant to map libgfortran version numbers (libgfortran.so.7 > with GCC 7). If it’s the gfortran.map node names, I’m happy with that indeed. > > Attached patch regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin16.3.0. > OK to commit?
Ok, thanks! > > >> Currently we have _gfortran_, that is with a single underscore in the >> beginning, so it's not in the "C/POSIX reserved for the implementation >> namespace". But yes, I agree that at least those functions documented >> under the non-Fortran main program section in the manual should be >> kept as is. > > Then, if we keep some functions under _gfortran_, I say let’s keep them all > there. It’s not hurting, and the few users who care have come to expect it. Fair enough, works for me. -- Janne Blomqvist
