On Jan  3, 2017, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote:

> What if REGNO is 2147483648 (assume 32 bit host).  That will get us
> into the else block in df_ref_record as it's >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER.

> In df_ref_create_structure, we use the same expression to compute
> REGNO, but this time it's interpreted as a signed integer, so
> -2147483648. That gets us into the path where we call
> TEST_HARD_REG_BIT and thus the oob array index.

> Right?

Yup, that's exactly how VRP goes about in concluding that there is
something to warn about.

If we get a pseudo count overflow, I guess we'll have bigger problems
than this one, but VRP doesn't know it ;-)

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer

Reply via email to