On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 03:37:14PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> As suggested in [1], you should write multi-line enums like:
>>
>> enum foo
>> {
>> a = ...
>> b = ...
>> }
>
> Sure. Plus it depends on if users of the APIs should just write the operands
> on their own as numbers, or as __SGX_E*, or as E*.
> In the first case the patch sans formatting is reasonable, in the second case
> the enums should be moved to file scope, in the last case we have to live
> with the namespace pollution.
> The pdf you've referenced in the thread doesn't list the _encls_u32 and
> _enclu_u32 intrinsics, so I think it depends on what ICC does (if it has been
> shipped with such a support already, or on coordination with ICC if not).
Jakub, it is in accordance with ICC.
So the first case will be used.
--
WBR,
Andrew
