> 2017-01-24 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> > > * cgraph.c (cgraph_node::dump): Dump function version info. > * symtab.c (symtab_node::dump_base): Add missing new line. > --- > gcc/cgraph.c | 10 ++++++++++ > gcc/symtab.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gcc/cgraph.c b/gcc/cgraph.c > index ef2dc50282c..74839f7d993 100644 > --- a/gcc/cgraph.c > +++ b/gcc/cgraph.c > @@ -2066,6 +2066,16 @@ cgraph_node::dump (FILE *f) > fprintf (f, " Profile id: %i\n", > profile_id); > fprintf (f, " First run: %i\n", tp_first_run); > + cgraph_function_version_info *vi = function_version (); > + if (vi != NULL) > + { > + /* Iterate to first item in the chain. */ > + while (vi->prev != NULL) > + vi = vi->prev; > + fprintf (f, " Version info: "); > + dump_addr (f, "@", (void *)vi); > + fprintf (f, "\n");
I suppose it is useful to know that version info is attached, but instead of dumping an address, i would rather meaningfully print its contents (i.e. dispatcher and prev/next pointers in list). OK with that change. honza > + } > fprintf (f, " Function flags:"); > if (count) > fprintf (f, " executed %" PRId64"x", > diff --git a/gcc/symtab.c b/gcc/symtab.c > index 87febdc212f..0078896c8a8 100644 > --- a/gcc/symtab.c > +++ b/gcc/symtab.c > @@ -890,6 +890,7 @@ symtab_node::dump_base (FILE *f) > { > fprintf (f, " Aux:"); > dump_addr (f, " @", (void *)aux); > + fprintf (f, "\n"); > } > > fprintf (f, " References: "); > -- > 2.11.0 >