On 02/13/2017 01:58 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 02/13/2017 11:15 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >> In order to not cause a stack overflow, lets use a vector allocated on heap >> instead of >> the one created by XALLOCVEC. >> >> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests. > > Ok. I'm surprised this is marked as a regression, but it's simple enough that > it probably ought to be fixed in any case.
Yep. I've just removed that. Is it also fine to both active branches after it finishes regression tests? Thanks, Martin > > > Bernd
