The following patch improves the constant_after_peeling estimate of
the GIMPLE unroller by not requiring a strictly "simple-iv" but
an evolution w/o symbols.  It also avoids computing any of this for
ops defined in a subloop of the loop we unroll (that only yields
garbage).  So it makes constant_after_peeling cheaper as well.

It also adjusts the simple-minded CCP to propagate all constants
(esp. float and vector constants).

Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress, queued for 
GCC 8.

Richard.

2016-02-14  Richard Biener  <rguent...@suse.de>

        * tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c (constant_after_peeling): Do not require
        sth as strict as a simple_iv but a chrec without symbols and an
        operand defined in the loop we are peeling (and not some subloop).
        (propagate_constants_for_unrolling): Propagate all constants.

        * gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-13.c: Adjust to prevent unrolling
        of inner loops.
        * gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-7.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-104.c: Likewise.

Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c (revision 245417)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c (working copy)
@@ -157,8 +157,6 @@ struct loop_size
 static bool
 constant_after_peeling (tree op, gimple *stmt, struct loop *loop)
 {
-  affine_iv iv;
-
   if (is_gimple_min_invariant (op))
     return true;
 
@@ -188,12 +186,12 @@ constant_after_peeling (tree op, gimple
       return false;
     }
 
-  /* Induction variables are constants.  */
-  if (!simple_iv (loop, loop_containing_stmt (stmt), op, &iv, false))
-    return false;
-  if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (iv.base))
+  /* Induction variables are constants when defined in loop.  */
+  if (loop_containing_stmt (stmt) != loop)
     return false;
-  if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (iv.step))
+  tree ev = analyze_scalar_evolution (loop, op);
+  if (chrec_contains_undetermined (ev)
+      || chrec_contains_symbols (ev))
     return false;
   return true;
 }
@@ -1259,7 +1257,7 @@ propagate_constants_for_unrolling (basic
 
       if (! SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (result)
          && gimple_phi_num_args (phi) == 1
-         && TREE_CODE (arg) == INTEGER_CST)
+         && CONSTANT_CLASS_P (arg))
        {
          replace_uses_by (result, arg);
          gsi_remove (&gsi, true);
@@ -1276,7 +1274,7 @@ propagate_constants_for_unrolling (basic
       tree lhs;
 
       if (is_gimple_assign (stmt)
-         && gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt) == INTEGER_CST
+         && TREE_CODE_CLASS (gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt)) == tcc_constant
          && (lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt), TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME)
          && !SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (lhs))
        {
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-13.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-13.c     (revision 245417)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-13.c     (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "--param max-completely-peel-times=1" } */
 
 #include <stdarg.h>
 #include "tree-vect.h"
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-7.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-7.c      (revision 245417)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-7.c      (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "--param max-completely-peel-times=1" } */
 
 #include <stdarg.h>
 #include "tree-vect.h"
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-104.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-104.c        (revision 245417)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-104.c        (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "--param max-completely-peel-times=1" } */
 
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <stdarg.h>

Reply via email to