On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:41:09AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> lo_sum is indeed not valid for mem:SD. simplify_operand_subreg is
> where the subreg disappears.
Richard, doesn't the following say that lra is expecting to reload
exactly the lo_sum address you seem to think it should not handle in
process_address?
/* We still can reload address and if the address is
valid, we can remove subreg without reloading its
inner memory. */
&& valid_address_p (GET_MODE (subst),
regno_reg_rtx
[ira_class_hard_regs
[base_reg_class (GET_MODE (subst),
MEM_ADDR_SPACE (subst),
ADDRESS, SCRATCH)][0]],
MEM_ADDR_SPACE (subst))))
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
