Hello.
As mentioned in the PR, I hope rejecting -flto option with both GIMPLE and RTL
can
work for the issue.
Ready after it finishes regression tests?
Thanks,
Martin
>From 3c26a29821b52d4e90fa05686a473b565ddf5ba9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin <mli...@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:35:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Do not allow to run GIMPLE or RTL test-cases w/ LTO (PR
lto/79625).
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-02-28 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
PR lto/79625
* read-rtl-function.c (function_reader::handle_unknown_directive):
Bail out when one uses -flto.
gcc/c/ChangeLog:
2017-02-28 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
PR lto/79625
* gimple-parser.c (c_parser_parse_gimple_body):
Bail out when one uses -flto.
---
gcc/c/gimple-parser.c | 3 +++
gcc/read-rtl-function.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/c/gimple-parser.c b/gcc/c/gimple-parser.c
index 0d6384b55c2..c56a2a4ac48 100644
--- a/gcc/c/gimple-parser.c
+++ b/gcc/c/gimple-parser.c
@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ static void c_parser_gimple_expr_list (c_parser *, vec<tree> *);
void
c_parser_parse_gimple_body (c_parser *parser)
{
+ if (flag_lto)
+ error ("%<__GIMPLE%> function cannot be compiled with %<-flto%>");
+
gimple_seq seq = NULL;
gimple_seq body = NULL;
tree stmt = push_stmt_list ();
diff --git a/gcc/read-rtl-function.c b/gcc/read-rtl-function.c
index bead85811e6..8552cd2ae8c 100644
--- a/gcc/read-rtl-function.c
+++ b/gcc/read-rtl-function.c
@@ -405,6 +405,9 @@ function_reader::handle_unknown_directive (file_location start_loc,
if (strcmp (name, "function"))
fatal_at (start_loc, "expected 'function'");
+ if (flag_lto)
+ error ("%<__RTL%> function cannot be compiled with %<-flto%>");
+
parse_function ();
}
--
2.11.1
