On 03/03/17 10:47 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
This patch caused a new regression on AIX.- David FAIL: 17_intro/names.cc (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/sys/types.h:600: error: expected unqualified-id before '[' token /tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/sys/types.h:600: error: expected ')' before '[' token /tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/sys/types.h:668: error: expected unqualified-id before '[' token /tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/sys/types.h:668: error: expected ')' before '[' token /tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:332: error: 'parameter' declared as function returning a function /tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:332: error: expected primary-expression before 'void' /tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/math.h:1458: error: expected unqualified-id before ',' token /tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/math.h:1458: error: expected ')' before ',' token AIX types.h:600 is typedef struct { int r[1]; } * physadr_t; stdlib.h:332 is extern int at_quick_exit(void (*f)(void)); math.h:1458 is struct dbl_hypot { double x, y; };
I think the AIX headers should be using reserved names there, but this should fix it: --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/names.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/names.cc @@ -55,7 +55,9 @@ // <queue> and <stack> defined data members called c #define d ( #define e ( +#ifndef _AIX #define f ( +#endif #define g ( #if __cplusplus >= 201402L // <chrono> defines operator ""h in C++14 @@ -84,7 +86,9 @@ #define p ( #endif #define q ( +#ifndef _AIX #define r ( +#endif #if __cplusplus >= 201103L // <random> defines member functions called s() and t() // <chrono> and <string> define operator ""s in C++14 @@ -95,7 +99,9 @@ #define u ( #define v ( #define w ( +#ifndef _AIX #define x ( #define y ( +#endif #define z ( #include <bits/stdc++.h> I'll test it later today.
