On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:36:38PM -0600, Will Schmidt wrote: > Per PR79941, we are folding the vec_mul{e,o}* operations improperly. Those > entries were added to the intrinsics-to-be-folded list where the generic > multiplies should have been instead. Test coverage in place was for the > generic multiplies, and this was missed by my testing. > > Thusly, remove those entries from the folding list. At the same time, I > am adding a testcase to provide some basic coverage for those ops. > > Functional gimple folding for those operations will be showing up at > a later time. > > OK for trunk? > regtest is currently running on ppc64*.
Okay if testing passed. Thanks, Segher