On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 01:57:31PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> I just noticed that nothing has happened at all in a month, so anything
> is better than the tests XPASSing on a number of targets.
> 
> So the patch is ok for mainline with sparc*-*-* added to the target
> lists and a reference to PR testsuite/79356 in the comment.
> 
> I'd still be very grateful if Martin could have a look what's really
> going on here, though.

Same here.

Committed as:


Subject: [PATCH] testsuite, 79356

As stated in the PR (and elsewhere), this test now passes on aarch64,
ia64, mips, powerpc, sparc, and s390x.  This patch disables the xfails
for those targets.


gcc/testsuite/
        PR testsuite/79356
        * gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c: Don't xfail on aarch64, ia64, mips,
        powerpc, sparc, or s390x.

---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c
index fac8b18..fe0cb5c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c
@@ -45,10 +45,10 @@ typedef __SIZE_TYPE__    size_t;
     return CAT (alloc_anti_range_, __LINE__)(n);               \
   } typedef void dummy   /* Require a semicolon.  */
 
-/* The following tests fail because of missing range information.  */
-TEST (signed char, SCHAR_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX);   /* { dg-warning "argument 1 
range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "missing range info 
for signed char" { xfail *-*-* } } */
-TEST (short, SHRT_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX); /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
\\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "missing range info for 
short" { xfail *-*-* } } */
-
+/* The following tests fail because of missing range information.  The xfail
+   exclusions are PR79356.  */
+TEST (signed char, SCHAR_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX);   /* { dg-warning "argument 1 
range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "missing range info 
for signed char" { xfail { ! { aarch64*-*-* ia64-*-* mips*-*-* powerpc*-*-* 
sparc*-*-* s390x-*-* } } } } */
+TEST (short, SHRT_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX); /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
\\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "missing range info for 
short" { xfail { ! { aarch64*-*-* ia64-*-* mips*-*-* powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-* 
s390x-*-* } } } } */
 TEST (int, INT_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX);    /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
\\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" } */
 TEST (int, -3, ALLOC_MAX);             /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
\\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" } */
 TEST (int, -2, ALLOC_MAX);             /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
\\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" } */
-- 
1.9.3

Reply via email to