Hi!

We ICE on the following testcase, because we attempt to use
DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE instead of original FIELD_DECL
in a COMPONENT_REF in a VL structure, but DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE's
DECL_FIELD_OFFSET is not really gimplified and even if it was,
it wouldn't be current.  From the expr.c and stor-layout.c comments,
seems DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE's DECL_FIELD_OFFSET is guaranteed
to be the same as the corresponding field's by construction if it is not
constant, all the differences if any are in DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET.

Therefore, it should be safe to reuse 3rd COMPONENT_REF operand.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2017-03-24  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR sanitizer/80168
        * asan.c (instrument_derefs): Copy over last operand from
        original COMPONENT_REF to the new COMPONENT_REF with
        DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE.
        * ubsan.c (instrument_object_size): Likewise.

        * gcc.dg/asan/pr80168.c: New test.

--- gcc/asan.c.jj       2017-03-21 07:57:00.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/asan.c  2017-03-24 17:02:35.451865004 +0100
@@ -1868,7 +1868,8 @@ instrument_derefs (gimple_stmt_iterator
       tree repr = DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE (TREE_OPERAND (t, 1));
       instrument_derefs (iter, build3 (COMPONENT_REF, TREE_TYPE (repr),
                                       TREE_OPERAND (t, 0), repr,
-                                      NULL_TREE), location, is_store);
+                                      TREE_OPERAND (t, 2)),
+                        location, is_store);
       return;
     }
 
--- gcc/ubsan.c.jj      2017-03-07 07:10:00.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/ubsan.c 2017-03-24 17:02:58.439568314 +0100
@@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ instrument_object_size (gimple_stmt_iter
        {
          tree repr = DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE (TREE_OPERAND (t, 1));
          t = build3 (COMPONENT_REF, TREE_TYPE (repr), TREE_OPERAND (t, 0),
-                     repr, NULL_TREE);
+                     repr, TREE_OPERAND (t, 2));
        }
       break;
     case ARRAY_REF:
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/pr80168.c.jj      2017-03-24 17:08:14.440489868 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/pr80168.c 2017-03-24 17:09:08.567791277 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* PR sanitizer/80168 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+int a;
+
+int
+foo (void)
+{
+  struct S { int c[a]; int q : 8; int e : 4; } f;
+  f.e = 4;
+  return f.e;
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to