On 03/04/17 20:06 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 03/04/17 11:48 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
[ dup, I sent the wrong from the wrong email address, you might not see it
because of that ]
On Apr 3, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Mike Stump <m...@mrs.kithrup.com> wrote:
On Apr 3, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
This fixes lots of typos throughout the tree. Can this be committed to
trunk as obvious?
Yes, it can. However, I like it when even this patch is reviewed. I reviewed
it, looks good.
You missed initialisers -> initializers.
Ah yes, in a couple of places.
I think the original email about these typos only covered words
beginning with the letters A to E, so there are bound to be lots more
typos unfixed :-)
Not sure I like datastructures, should be data structures?
Will do. I also forgot to do something about the "accestor ???" part
We provide accestor to the inline_summary datastructure and
basic logic updating the parameters when inlining is performed.
I don't know what that's supposed to say. "access"? "accessors"?
I went for "access".
Thanks for the review.
figure out that poth parameters -> figure out that both parameters
I'll fix that.
I've bootstrapped the C and C++ compilers, but not Ada, and of course
not compiled all the target changes in gcc/config/*
Is one big commit OK, or one per-ChangeLog? Or something else?
I'd just do one big commit.
Will do, thanks.