On 2017-04-06 11:12 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > With the likely deprecation in mind, I've only done a cursory review of > the changes -- mostly to verify that they hit Cilk+ paths only.
> What's the purpose behind changing when we set the in_lto_p flag? Without that change, GCC with my patch ICEed with _Cilk_spawn and -flto -O3 -fcilkplus since __cilkrts_stack_frame.ctx's type (array of void *) was not TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY_P in lto stage. If this change is not proper, I'll work on modifying my patch to work without touching in_lto_p. -- Xi Ruoyao <r...@stu.xidian.edu.cn> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
