On 2017-05-02 09:16 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > This could be related to --enable-checking=release: > > In file included from ../../gcc/c-family/c-common.h:26:0, > from ../../gcc/c-family/cilk.c:28: > ../../gcc/c-family/cilk.c: In function 'bool > cilk_set_spawn_marker(location_t, tree)': > ../../gcc/tree.h:901:42: error: 'tree_check2' was not declared in this scope > CALL_EXPR, AGGR_INIT_EXPR)->base.u.bits.unsigned_flag) > ^ > ../../gcc/c-family/cilk.c:113:9: note: in expansion of macro 'EXPR_CILK_SPAWN' > EXPR_CILK_SPAWN (fcall) = 1; > ^ > ../../gcc/tree.h:901:42: error: 'tree_check2' was not declared in this scope > CALL_EXPR, AGGR_INIT_EXPR)->base.u.bits.unsigned_flag) > ^ > ../../gcc/c-family/cilk.c:115:9: note: in expansion of macro 'EXPR_CILK_SPAWN' > EXPR_CILK_SPAWN (TREE_OPERAND (fcall, 1)) = 1; > ^ > > Andreas. >
Sorry T_T. I've made a stupid mistake in tree.h. Let's apply following patch, and alert the RM when backporting r247446. 2017-05-02 Xi Ruoyao <r...@stu.xidian.edu.cn> * tree.h (EXPR_CILK_SPAWN): Use macro TREE_CHECK2 instead of function tree_check2. --- gcc/tree.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h index 3bca90a..fdaa7af 100644 --- a/gcc/tree.h +++ b/gcc/tree.h @@ -897,8 +897,8 @@ extern void omp_clause_range_check_failed (const_tree, const char *, int, /* If this is true, we should insert a __cilk_detach call just before this function call. */ #define EXPR_CILK_SPAWN(NODE) \ - (tree_check2 (NODE, __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__, \ - CALL_EXPR, AGGR_INIT_EXPR)->base.u.bits.unsigned_flag) + (TREE_CHECK2 (NODE, CALL_EXPR, \ + AGGR_INIT_EXPR)->base.u.bits.unsigned_flag) /* In a RESULT_DECL, PARM_DECL and VAR_DECL, means that it is passed by invisible reference (and the TREE_TYPE is a pointer to the true -- 2.7.1 -- Xi Ruoyao <r...@stu.xidian.edu.cn> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University