On 20/04/17 16:53, Wilco Dijkstra wrote: > > ping James has already approved this on 17 March, why are you pinging again?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00918.html > > From: Wilco Dijkstra > Sent: 16 March 2017 17:22 > To: GCC Patches; Evandro Menezes; andrew.pin...@cavium.com; > jim.wil...@linaro.org > Cc: nd > Subject: [PATCH][AArch64] Enable AES fusion with -mcpu=generic > > Many supported cores implement fusion of AES instructions. When fusion > happens it can give a significant performance gain. If not, scheduling > fusion candidates next to each other has almost no effect on performance. > Due to the high benefit/low cost it makes sense to enable AES fusion with > -mcpu=generic so that cores that support it always benefit. Any objections? > > Bootstrapped on AArch64, no regressions. > > ChangeLog: > 2017-03-16 Wilco Dijkstra <wdijk...@arm.com> > > * gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c (generic_tunings): Add AES fusion. > > -- > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c > index > 728ce7029f1e2b5161d9f317d10e564dd5a5f472..c8cf7169a5d387de336920b50c83761dc0c96f3a > 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c > @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static const struct tune_params generic_tunings = > &generic_approx_modes, > 4, /* memmov_cost */ > 2, /* issue_rate */ > - AARCH64_FUSE_NOTHING, /* fusible_ops */ > + (AARCH64_FUSE_AES_AESMC), /* fusible_ops */ > 8, /* function_align. */ > 8, /* jump_align. */ > 4, /* loop_align. */ > >
