On May 10, 2017 6:36:20 PM GMT+02:00, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote: >On 05/10/2017 10:21 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote: >> On 10 May 2017 at 14:40, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote: > >> >> I appreciate that, but given that I operate under Write-After >Approval, I need >> more than a no-objection, I will need an actual ok from a maintainer. >:) > >IIUC backports have to fix a regression. So you'll need to convince >the >release maintainer. From a C++ POV you're approved.
Wrong-code, rejects-valid and ice-on-valid-code are generally fine to backport if the fixes are not too intrusive. Richard. >nathan