Hi Nathan, Interestingly, this patch applies cleanly, but does *not* solve the problem with libgo. Another puzzling development, since bisection showed all revisions before this being clean and all revisions afterward being problematic. Drat. :(
I will have to go deeper into what's happening with the libgo test. Thanks for the patch! Too bad it didn't make a difference, though I can't be surprised since the revision targeted by the bisect looks so innocuous. Bill > On May 17, 2017, at 1:02 PM, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote: > > On 05/17/2017 01:53 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >> Bill, >> the revision you converged on is, as Ian, says, just moving some interface >> around. That was needed to fix obj-c++. >> This diff is the combination of that patch and its logical predecessor. Does >> reverting this diff get you back to normalcy? > > Sorry, apply this diff. I'd already done the -R applying bits > > nathan > > -- > Nathan Sidwell >
