On 23/05/17 13:58 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 05/23/2017 01:56 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 18/05/17 13:44 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
References can't be CV qualified, so the REFERENCE_TYPE check
seems superfluous?
True. I did it because that matches the semantics of the cast
according to the standard, but it isn't needed here. Is it worth
keeping anyway, to avoid a redundant call to cv_unqualified?
I don't think it's worth checking.
Ah yes, cp_build_qualified_type_real returns early if there's nothing
to do. OK, I'll remove those checks. Thanks.
