On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:47:34PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi Jakub!
>
> On Tue, 23 May 2017 13:17:26 +0200, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 07:42:38PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > For OpenACC 1.0 compatibility, we need to provide the aliases
> > > acc_async_wait, and acc_async_wait_all for acc_wait, and acc_wait_all,
> > > respectively.
>
> > > OpenACC 1.0 compatibility: acc_async_wait, acc_async_wait_all
>
> > All I've said about acc_pcopyin applies here too.
>
> Obviously. ;-)
>
> > Except that OACC_1.0
> > as symbol version might look like a good idea here.
>
> GCC never implemented OpenACC 1.0 but directly started with 2.0a, so I
> would find it confusing to now starting using 1.0 versions for these
> symbols specifically.
>
> OK for trunk using "OACC_2.0.1" symbol version?
Ok.
Jakub
