On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Robin Dapp <rd...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> So what did actually change? I'd rather not diff the diffs. Can you >> provide an incremental change, aka p6 that would apply to the >> previous series instead? > > -p6.diff attached which also addresses Richard's remark regarding vf/2. > Note that this applies to the old series but the old series itself (-p3) > doesn't apply to trunk anymore (because of the change in > vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment).
The series is ok. Thanks, Richard. > Regards > Robin > > -- > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > 2017-05-24 Robin Dapp <rd...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_get_peeling_costs_all_drs): > Introduce unknown_misalignment parameter and remove vf. > (vect_peeling_hash_get_lowest_cost): > Pass unknown_misalignemtn parameter. > (vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment): > Fix unsupportable data ref treatment. >
