Re: [PATCH 3/3] [D] libiberty: Prefix mangled D initializer symbols

[Ian Lance Taylor via gcc-patches]

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> wrote:
> This is instead of adding a `.init$' postfix, which gave it a
> property-style name.  My rationale being that "initializer for symbol"
> is much more informative when inspecting D runtime type information in
> gdb, which is the only place where you would encounter references to
> this compiler-generated symbol.

This is OK.

Thanks.

Ian