On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 22/05/17 16:14 -0400, Tim Song wrote: > Ah I see. > >> The original patch does that (assuming core issue 1227's resolution), >> but the __and_ version doesn't; __and_ only short circuits the >> immediate parameter, not things used in forming it. > > > Then the original patch is OK for trunk and gcc-7-branch. > > Thank you Tim and Tim for the explanations. >
Committed. I didn't bother using remove_cv<remove_reference<T>> only because p0088r3 says decay_t. -- Regards, Tim Shen
