[ was: Re: [nvptx, PATCH, 3/3] Add v2di support ]
On 06/06/2017 03:12 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
diff --git a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c/vec.c
b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c/vec.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..79c1c17
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c/vec.c
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" } { "" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "*" } { "-DACC_MEM_SHARED=0" } } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-std=c99 -ftree-slp-vectorize
-foffload=-ftree-slp-vectorize -foffload=-fdump-tree-slp1 -foffload=-save-temps
-save-temps" } */
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <sys/time.h>
+
+long long int p[32 *1000] __attribute__((aligned(16)));
+long long int p2[32 *1000] __attribute__((aligned(16)));
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+#pragma acc parallel num_gangs(1) num_workers(1) vector_length(32)
+ {
+ if (((unsigned long int)p & (0xfULL)) != 0)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ if (((unsigned long int)p2 & (0xfULL)) != 0)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+
+ for (unsigned int k = 0; k < 10000; k += 1)
+ {
+#pragma acc loop vector
+ for (unsigned long long int j = 0; j < 32; j += 1)
+ {
+ unsigned long long a, b;
+ unsigned long long *p3, *p4;
+ p3 = (unsigned long long *)((unsigned long long int)p & (~0xfULL));
+ p4 = (unsigned long long *)((unsigned long long int)p2 & (~0xfULL));
+
+ for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 1000; i += 2)
+ {
+ a = p3[j * 1000 + i];
+ b = p3[j * 1000 + i + 1];
+
+ p4[j * 1000 + i] = a;
+ p4[j * 1000 + i + 1] = b;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Todo: make a scan-tree-dump variant that scans vec.o instead. */
+/* { dg-final { file copy -force [glob vec.o.*] [regsub \.o\. [glob vec.o.*]
\.c\.] } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "vector\\(2\\) long long unsigned int" "slp1" }
} */
Hi,
we have scan-tree-dump that scans in test.c.* files. But when we run
lto1 for the offloaded region, we produce test.o.* files instead. In
the test-case above, I work around that by using 'dg-final { file copy
}'. What is a good way to get rid of this workaround ?
Add scan-o-tree-dump ?
Or make the "slp1" field smarter, and allow f.i. "o.slp1" ?
Thanks,
- Tom
