Hi,
This simple patch refactors partition merge code and dump information.

Bootstrap and test on x86_64 and AArch64.  Is it OK?

Thanks,
bin
2017-06-07  Bin Cheng  <bin.ch...@arm.com>

        * tree-loop-distribution.c (enum fuse_type, fuse_message): New.
        (partition_merge_into): New parameter.  Dump reason for fusion.
        (distribute_loop): Update use of partition_merge_into.
From d0b2d528931f6a8057bd0ac442fe9a0e7158044c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bin Cheng <binch...@e108451-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 14:16:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 05/14] partition-merge-dump-20170607.txt

---
 gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
index a32253c..ce6db66 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
@@ -545,15 +545,42 @@ partition_reduction_p (partition *partition)
   return partition->reduction_p;
 }
 
+/* Partitions are fused because of different reasons.  */
+enum fuse_type
+{
+  FUSE_NON_BUILTIN = 0,
+  FUSE_REDUCTION = 1,
+  FUSE_SHARE_REF = 2,
+  FUSE_SAME_SCC = 3,
+  FUSE_FINALIZE = 4
+};
+
+/* Description on different fusing reason.  */
+static const char *fuse_message[] = {
+  "they are non-builtins",
+  "they have reductions",
+  "they have shared memory refs",
+  "they are in the same dependence scc",
+  "there is no point to distribute loop"};
+
 /* Merge PARTITION into the partition DEST.  */
 
 static void
-partition_merge_into (partition *dest, partition *partition)
+partition_merge_into (partition *dest, partition *partition, enum fuse_type ft)
 {
   dest->kind = PKIND_NORMAL;
   bitmap_ior_into (dest->stmts, partition->stmts);
   if (partition_reduction_p (partition))
     dest->reduction_p = true;
+
+  if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+    {
+      fprintf (dump_file, "Fuse partitions because %s:\n", fuse_message[ft]);
+      fprintf (dump_file, "  Part 1: ");
+      dump_bitmap (dump_file, dest->stmts);
+      fprintf (dump_file, "  Part 2: ");
+      dump_bitmap (dump_file, partition->stmts);
+    }
 }
 
 
@@ -1534,13 +1561,7 @@ distribute_loop (struct loop *loop, vec<gimple *> stmts,
       for (++i; partitions.iterate (i, &partition); ++i)
        if (!partition_builtin_p (partition))
          {
-           if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
-             {
-               fprintf (dump_file, "fusing non-builtin partitions\n");
-               dump_bitmap (dump_file, into->stmts);
-               dump_bitmap (dump_file, partition->stmts);
-             }
-           partition_merge_into (into, partition);
+           partition_merge_into (into, partition, FUSE_NON_BUILTIN);
            partitions.unordered_remove (i);
            partition_free (partition);
            i--;
@@ -1556,14 +1577,7 @@ distribute_loop (struct loop *loop, vec<gimple *> stmts,
   for (i = i + 1; partitions.iterate (i, &partition); ++i)
     if (partition_reduction_p (partition))
       {
-       if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
-         {
-           fprintf (dump_file, "fusing partitions\n");
-           dump_bitmap (dump_file, into->stmts);
-           dump_bitmap (dump_file, partition->stmts);
-           fprintf (dump_file, "because they have reductions\n");
-         }
-       partition_merge_into (into, partition);
+       partition_merge_into (into, partition, FUSE_REDUCTION);
        partitions.unordered_remove (i);
        partition_free (partition);
        i--;
@@ -1581,15 +1595,7 @@ distribute_loop (struct loop *loop, vec<gimple *> stmts,
        {
          if (similar_memory_accesses (rdg, into, partition))
            {
-             if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
-               {
-                 fprintf (dump_file, "fusing partitions\n");
-                 dump_bitmap (dump_file, into->stmts);
-                 dump_bitmap (dump_file, partition->stmts);
-                 fprintf (dump_file, "because they have similar "
-                          "memory accesses\n");
-               }
-             partition_merge_into (into, partition);
+             partition_merge_into (into, partition, FUSE_SHARE_REF);
              partitions.unordered_remove (j);
              partition_free (partition);
              j--;
@@ -1681,15 +1687,7 @@ distribute_loop (struct loop *loop, vec<gimple *> stmts,
          for (j = j + 1; partitions.iterate (j, &partition); ++j)
            if (pg->vertices[j].component == i)
              {
-               if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
-                 {
-                   fprintf (dump_file, "fusing partitions\n");
-                   dump_bitmap (dump_file, first->stmts);
-                   dump_bitmap (dump_file, partition->stmts);
-                   fprintf (dump_file, "because they are in the same "
-                            "dependence SCC\n");
-                 }
-               partition_merge_into (first, partition);
+               partition_merge_into (first, partition, FUSE_SAME_SCC);
                partitions[j] = NULL;
                partition_free (partition);
                PGDATA (j)->partition = NULL;
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to