On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote:
> On 06/09/2017 03:35 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> You can directly transform to no_sanitize with integer mask, not sure why
>> you'd need an intermediate step with a string?
>
> Hello.
>
> Done in attached patch, I'm sending both incremental and final version
> (complete patch).
> I also decided to support no_sanitize attribute in pretty printer:
>
> __attribute__((no_sanitize (address | shift | shift-base | shift-exponent |
> integer-divide-by-zero | undefined | unreachable | vla-bound | return | null
> | signed-integer-overflow | bool | enum | float-divide-by-zero |
> float-cast-overflow | bounds | bounds-strict | alignment | nonnull-attribute
> | returns-nonnull-attribute | object-size | vptr)))
> fn1 ()
> {
> char my_char[9];
> char * ptr2;
> char * ptr;
> ..
>
>
> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed?
+unsigned int
+parse_no_sanitize_attribute (char *value, char **wrong_argument)
+{
functions need a comment.
Otherwise looks ok to me.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Martin
