It's ill-formed to inherit a constructor from an indirect base, but we were failing to catch that for virtual bases, whose binfos look like direct bases.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit b8d3d6f1932db56d61c522bcdcff5142b307e23c Author: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> Date: Thu Jun 29 11:06:06 2017 -0400 PR c++/81164 - ICE with invalid inherited constructor. * search.c (binfo_direct_p): New. * name-lookup.c (do_class_using_decl): Use it. diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h index 946a916..a70b909 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h @@ -6603,6 +6603,7 @@ extern tree dfs_walk_all (tree, tree (*) (tree, void *), extern tree dfs_walk_once (tree, tree (*) (tree, void *), tree (*) (tree, void *), void *); extern tree binfo_via_virtual (tree, tree); +extern bool binfo_direct_p (tree); extern tree build_baselink (tree, tree, tree, tree); extern tree adjust_result_of_qualified_name_lookup (tree, tree, tree); diff --git a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c index 2ca71b6..3eb2c0d 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c +++ b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c @@ -4172,8 +4172,7 @@ do_class_using_decl (tree scope, tree name) return NULL_TREE; } } - else if (name == ctor_identifier - && BINFO_INHERITANCE_CHAIN (BINFO_INHERITANCE_CHAIN (binfo))) + else if (name == ctor_identifier && !binfo_direct_p (binfo)) { error ("cannot inherit constructors from indirect base %qT", scope); return NULL_TREE; diff --git a/gcc/cp/search.c b/gcc/cp/search.c index d7895a0..c37488d 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/search.c +++ b/gcc/cp/search.c @@ -2973,6 +2973,28 @@ binfo_via_virtual (tree binfo, tree limit) return NULL_TREE; } +/* BINFO is for a base class in some hierarchy. Return true iff it is a + direct base. */ + +bool +binfo_direct_p (tree binfo) +{ + tree d_binfo = BINFO_INHERITANCE_CHAIN (binfo); + if (BINFO_INHERITANCE_CHAIN (d_binfo)) + /* A second inheritance chain means indirect. */ + return false; + if (!BINFO_VIRTUAL_P (binfo)) + /* Non-virtual, so only one inheritance chain means direct. */ + return true; + /* A virtual base looks like a direct base, so we need to look through the + direct bases to see if it's there. */ + tree b_binfo; + for (int i = 0; BINFO_BASE_ITERATE (d_binfo, i, b_binfo); ++i) + if (b_binfo == binfo) + return true; + return false; +} + /* BINFO is a base binfo in the complete type BINFO_TYPE (HERE). Find the equivalent binfo within whatever graph HERE is located. This is the inverse of original_binfo. */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/inh-ctor28.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/inh-ctor28.C new file mode 100644 index 0000000..90a06c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/inh-ctor28.C @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +// PR c++/81164 +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } + +struct A {}; +struct B : virtual A {}; +struct C : virtual A {}; +struct D : B,C { using A::A; }; // { dg-error "indirect" }