On 07/13/2017 03:59 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > The only concern I'd have here is the bits in dbxout.[ch] might > effectively be the best documentation of the dbxout format that exists. > Thus, dropping something like N_SO_PASCAL loses that historical > documentation.
FYI, there's a texinfo document in the GDB repo describing the stabs format, and it documents N_SO_PASCAL: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo;h=a7ea808a41b290b7dfc4f44801a540a834ee04db;hb=HEAD#l440 A pre-generated html version is live here: https://www.sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/stabs.html https://www.sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/stabs.html#Source-Files Thanks, Pedro Alves
