On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> The following patch implements the:
>   /* Optimize (c>=1) && (c<=127) into (signed char)c > 0.  */
>   if (integer_onep (low) && TREE_CODE (high) == INTEGER_CST)
>     {
>       int prec = TYPE_PRECISION (etype);
> 
>       if (wi::mask (prec - 1, false, prec) == high)
>         {
>           if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype))
>             {
>               tree signed_etype = signed_type_for (etype);
>               if (TYPE_PRECISION (signed_etype) != TYPE_PRECISION (etype))
>                 etype
>                   = build_nonstandard_integer_type (TYPE_PRECISION (etype), 
> 0);
>               else
>                 etype = signed_etype;
>               exp = fold_convert_loc (loc, etype, exp);
>             }
>           return fold_build2_loc (loc, GT_EXPR, type, exp,
>                               build_int_cst (etype, 0));
>         }
>     }
> optimization from build_range_check in match.pd if we already have the
> less efficient x-1U <= 127U-1U.  If somebody writes the range test
> as x>=1 && x <= 127, then it is already optimized well, but if somebody
> writes it as x-1U <= 126U, then it is not without this patch.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
> 
> In the PR Marc noted that the optimization might be useful even for
> constants other than 1, by transforming
> x+C1 <= C2 if unsigned and C2-C1==INT_MAX into (int)x > (int)(-1-C1).
> Shall I do that immediately, or incrementally?  Shall we also change
> build_range_check to do that (i.e. drop the integer_onep above and use
> right etype constant?  Also, I think the build_nonstandard_integer_type
> above is unnecessary, I think signed_type_for does already call that.

Yeah, that's legacy from the times signed_type_for used the langhook.

Let's do any improvements incrementally.  I, too, woudln't worry
about enhancing the fold-const.c variant unless proven necessary
by testcases from real-wrold code.

Patch is ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

> 2017-07-18  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR tree-optimization/81346
>       * match.pd: Optimize (X - 1U) <= INT_MAX-1U into (int) X > 0.
> 
>       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81346-5.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/match.pd.jj   2017-07-17 16:25:20.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/match.pd      2017-07-18 12:32:52.896924558 +0200
> @@ -1125,6 +1125,19 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
>       && wi::neg_p (@1, TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE (@1))))
>      (cmp @2 @0))))))
>  
> +/* (X - 1U) <= INT_MAX-1U into (int) X > 0.  */
> +(for cmp (le gt)
> +     icmp (gt le)
> + (simplify
> +  (cmp (plus @0 integer_minus_onep@1) INTEGER_CST@2)
> +   (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0))
> +     && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0))
> +     && TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@0)) > 1
> +     && wi::eq_p (@2, wi::max_value (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@0)),
> +                                     SIGNED) - 1))
> +    (with { tree stype = signed_type_for (TREE_TYPE (@0)); }
> +     (icmp (convert:stype @0) { build_int_cst (stype, 0); })))))
> +
>  /* X / 4 < Y / 4 iff X < Y when the division is known to be exact.  */
>  (for cmp (simple_comparison)
>   (simplify
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81346-5.c.jj      2017-07-18 
> 12:35:27.406063800 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81346-5.c 2017-07-18 12:37:04.460894965 
> +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/81346 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\(signed int\\) x" 10 "optimized" } } 
> */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " <= 0;" 5 "optimized" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " > 0;" 5 "optimized" } } */
> +
> +int f1 (unsigned x) { return x - 1 <= __INT_MAX__ - 1; }
> +int f2 (unsigned x) { unsigned a = 1, b = __INT_MAX__ - 1; return x - a <= 
> b; }
> +int f3 (unsigned x) { return x - 1 < __INT_MAX__; }
> +int f4 (unsigned x) { unsigned a = 1, b = __INT_MAX__; return x - a < b; }
> +int f5 (unsigned x) { return x >= 1 && x <= __INT_MAX__; }
> +int f6 (unsigned x) { return x - 1 > __INT_MAX__ - 1; }
> +int f7 (unsigned x) { unsigned a = 1, b = __INT_MAX__ - 1; return x - a > b; 
> }
> +int f8 (unsigned x) { return x - 1 >= __INT_MAX__; }
> +int f9 (unsigned x) { unsigned a = 1, b = __INT_MAX__; return x - a >= b; }
> +int f10 (unsigned x) { return x < 1 || x > __INT_MAX__; }
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to