On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Bill Schmidt
<wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I would like to backport this fix to GCC 5, 6, and 7.  All have passed 
> regstrap on
> powerpc64le-linux-gnu (with the test case moved to gcc.dg/ubsan, of course).
> Is this ok?

Yes.

Richard.

> Thanks!
>
> -- Bill
>
>
>> On Jul 14, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> PR81162 identifies a bug in SLSR involving overflow that occurs when
>> replacing a NEGATE_EXPR with a PLUS_EXPR.  This is another example
>> of an unprofitable transformation that should be skipped anyway,
>> hence this simple patch.  Bootstrapped and tested on
>> powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu, committed.  Test case provided from
>> the bug report.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> [gcc]
>>
>> 2016-07-14  Bill Schmidt  <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>>       PR tree-optimization/81162
>>       * gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c (replace_mult_candidate): Don't
>>       replace a negate with an add.
>>
>> [gcc/testsuite]
>>
>> 2016-07-14  Bill Schmidt  <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>>       PR tree-optimization/81162
>>       * gcc.dg/pr81162.c: New file.
>>
>>
>> Index: gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c       (revision 250189)
>> +++ gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c       (working copy)
>> @@ -2082,13 +2082,14 @@ replace_mult_candidate (slsr_cand_t c, tree basis_
>>      types but allows for safe negation without twisted logic.  */
>>   if (wi::fits_shwi_p (bump)
>>       && bump.to_shwi () != HOST_WIDE_INT_MIN
>> -      /* It is not useful to replace casts, copies, or adds of
>> +      /* It is not useful to replace casts, copies, negates, or adds of
>>        an SSA name and a constant.  */
>>       && cand_code != SSA_NAME
>>       && !CONVERT_EXPR_CODE_P (cand_code)
>>       && cand_code != PLUS_EXPR
>>       && cand_code != POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
>> -      && cand_code != MINUS_EXPR)
>> +      && cand_code != MINUS_EXPR
>> +      && cand_code != NEGATE_EXPR)
>>     {
>>       enum tree_code code = PLUS_EXPR;
>>       tree bump_tree;
>> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr81162.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr81162.c    (nonexistent)
>> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr81162.c    (working copy)
>> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
>> +/* PR tree-optimization/81162 */
>> +/* { dg-do run } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-fsanitize=undefined -O2" } */
>> +
>> +short s;
>> +int i1 = 1;
>> +int i2 = 1;
>> +unsigned char uc = 147;
>> +
>> +int main() {
>> +  s = (-uc + 2147483647) << 0;
>> +  if (9031239389974324562ULL >= (-((i1 && i2) + uc) ^ -21096) ) {
>> +    return 0;
>> +  } else {
>> +    return -1;
>> +  }
>> +}
>>
>

Reply via email to