On Jul 26, 2017, at 7:50 AM, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 23:35 +0900, Oleg Endo wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 16:05 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>>> 
>>> +
>>> +You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>>> +along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>>> +<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef GCC_SERVER_H
>>> +#define GCC_SERVER_H
>>> +
>>> +/* Wrapper aroung "int" for file descriptors.  */
>>                ~~~^
>>              around :)
> 
> Thanks; fixed in my working copy.
> 
> Someone pointed out to me privately that instead/as well as serving on
> a port, we could be launched as a subprocess by the IDE, and serve the
> RPC over stdin/stdout; this would be simpler for IDEs to cope with.  I
> may have a look at supporting that for the next version.

The security threat modeling I think is nicer if you read and write 
stdin/stdout.  Once you open a port, you open a security hole.  By not having 
holes by design, we avoid most of this space, which I see as a good thing.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to