Hi,
On 04/08/2017 19:00, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/14/2017 01:32 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ error ("cannot deduce template arguments for copy-initialization"
+ " of %qT, as it has no viable implicit deduction guides",
type);
Why "copy-initialization"? We do deduction for direct-initialization,
as well.
I would also drop the "implicit".
OK with those tweaks.
Thanks Jason for your review and, essentially, approval of the work.
About the exact wording, I'm a little puzzled, because, besides the
"implicit" nit, the "copy-inizialization" already occurs in two other
places in that function, in the preceding:
if (elided && !cands)
{
error ("cannot deduce template arguments for copy-initialization"
" of %qT, as it has no non-explicit deduction guides or "
"user-declared constructors", type);
return error_mark_node;
}
and in the following:
if (elided)
inform (input_location, "explicit deduction guides not considered "
"for copy-initialization");
and now I'm wondering which, if any, should be also removed?!? Both? Can
you help me about that?
Thanks,
Paolo.
