Hi, On Mon, 7 Aug 2017, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 9:40 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > > When there is no stack access, there is no need to use frame pointer > > even if -fno-omit-frame-pointer is used. > > > > Tested on i686 and x86-64. OK for trunk? > > LGTM. This will break unwinders relying on frame pointers to exist on all functions, for which projects conciously forced a frame pointer with this option. I don't think we can simply override user specified explicit wishes in this way, presumably they had a reason to use it. Ciao, Michael.
