On 08/01/2017 04:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
@@ -27632,6 +27769,9 @@ cp_parser_sizeof_operand (cp_parser* parser, enum rid
keyword)
{
tree type = NULL_TREE;
+ matching_parens parens;
+ parens.peek_open (parser);
I was puzzled by this until I found that cp_parser_compound_literal_p
consumes the open paren. Let's remove that in favor of calling
consume_open here, so we don't need peek_open anymore.
About passing parser in or not, I'm happy with the current approach;
adding things to the stack isn't free in a highly recursive program like
GCC.
Jason
