On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 05:47:11PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> > The postreload change is ok. >> >> The revert is OK even without approval.
I see. The patch is also OK. Thanks, Uros. > Well, it isn't a pure reversion, it is reversion plus addition of > const char *name = LABEL_NAME (label); > PUT_CODE (label, NOTE); > NOTE_KIND (label) = NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL; > NOTE_DELETED_LABEL_NAME (label) = name; > to the end of ix86_init_large_pic_reg. > >> >> 2017-09-13 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> >> >> >> >> PR target/82145 >> >> * postreload.c (reload_cse_simplify_operands): Skip >> >> NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL similarly to skipping CODE_LABEL. >> >> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_init_large_pic_reg): Revert 2017-09-01 >> >> changes. Turn CODE_LABEL into NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL immediately. >> >> (ix86_init_pic_reg): Revert 2017-09-01 changes. >> >> >> >> * gcc.target/i386/pr82145.c: New test. > > Jakub
