On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Rainer Orth
<r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> Daniel Santos <daniel.san...@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> On 09/17/2017 10:53 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> OK.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Uros.
>>
>> Thanks. I should have posted this Friday when my tests finished, but
>> I'll be committing with one minor change so tests don't run on m32 or mx32:
>>
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82196-1.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82196-1.c
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-do compile { target lp64 } } */
>> /* { dg-options "-msse -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues -O2" } */
>> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "call.*__sse_savms64_18" } } */
>> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "jmp.*__sse_resms64x_18" } } */
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82196-2.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82196-2.c
>> index 31705bee29b..8fe58411d5e 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82196-2.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82196-2.c
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-do compile { target lp64 } } */
>> /* { dg-options "-mavx -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues -O2" } */
>> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "call.*__avx_savms64_18" } } */
>> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "jmp.*__avx_resms64x_18" } } */
>>
>> Other than that, full regression tests pass.
>
> However, they do FAIL on 64-bit Solaris/x86:
>
> +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr82196-1.c (test for excess errors)
>
> Excess errors:
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82196-1.c:14:1:
> error: bp cannot be used in asm here
>
> +UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/i386/pr82196-1.c scan-assembler call.*__sse_savms64_18
> +UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/i386/pr82196-1.c scan-assembler jmp.*__sse_resms64x_18
> +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr82196-2.c (test for excess errors)
> +UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/i386/pr82196-2.c scan-assembler call.*__avx_savms64_18
> +UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/i386/pr82196-2.c scan-assembler jmp.*__avx_resms64x_18
Does the test compile with -fomit-frame-pointer?
Uros.
