Dear All, I seem to have messed up associate_31.f90 totally. Not only is it not doing the intended test but it is failing at all levels of optimization. I will remove it first thing tomorrow. Strangely, it did not fail when I regtested before committing.
Sorry about this. Paul On 21 September 2017 at 19:41, Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Jerry, > > Thanks! Committed as revision 253077. > > Cheers > > Paul > > On 21 September 2017 at 01:52, Jerry DeLisle <jvdeli...@charter.net> wrote: >> On 09/20/2017 09:45 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: >>> In the last update to the Parameterized Derived Types implementation, >>> I fixed PR60483 as a side effect. I then checked all the ASSOCIATE >>> bugs and noted that I was responsible for a number of regressions due >>> to a patch that I applied last year. I determined to fix them and >>> found that I couldn't stop. >>> >>> The PRs in the ChangeLogs are the low(ish) lying fruit and the changes >>> are fairly obvious or are described in the ChangeLog or the comments. >>> >>> Bootstrapped and regtested on FC23/x86_64 - OK for trunk and later on >>> 7-branch? >> >> Yes OK and thanks for the fixes. >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Jerry >> > > > > -- > "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" > - Albert Einstein -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
