On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:44:10PM +0000, Sudi Das wrote: > > Still waiting on Jakub's comment on whether there are more things needed > at the backend. But I have updated the patch according to Richard's > comments.
Well, we don't want to regress performance wise on one of the most important primary targets. I don't care that much if the RTL/backend work is done together with the patch, or as a follow-up during stage1/3, but it should be done, the testcases I've posted can be used as a basis of a P1 runtime performance regression. Jakub