On 28/09/17 11:50 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/09/17 07:46 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Gentle reminder, ok to commit ?
No. Could you and Petr please come to an agreement about what is
actually wrong with the current implementation, and agree on a
solution?
Currently you're both just proposing patches that do different things,
without indicating why one patch is better than the other.
I understand that we want to remove the debugmode-dependent behaviour,
but I'd like to see any other changes justified by references to the
standard.
Here's a test we currently fail, but it looks like we should pass it:
http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/test/std/iterators/stream.iterators/istreambuf.iterator/istreambuf.iterator.cons/proxy.pass.cpp
Do the changes either of you is proposing change this result?
