On 09/26/2017 06:49 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Andreas Krebbel <kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: ... > Sorry for the bikeshedding, but how about having a positive test > like vect_can_peel instead? ! vect_no... can be hard to read in > complex conditions. (There's already that problem with existing > vect_no...s.)
Done. Updated patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg01867.html Bye, -Andreas-
