Hi Paul,
I thought that the suggestion to add the original input lines was not
bad. It would be even better if -fdump-tree-original could do that. I
often time find myself putting a line under the spotlight in a
contained subroutine.
This should be doable.
What should be the perferred format?
Something like
filename:line\tOutput goes here
would be possible, or without the file name
line\tOutput goes here
The latter would have the advantage that it would be fairly easy to
line up the declarations from modules, which probably should not
have line number annotations.
And what would be preferred - having a new option to control line
numbering, or doing it unconditionally?
Regards
Thomas
