On 10/10/2011 06:23 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Janis Johnson wrote: > >> This patch skips several Power-specific tests if hard_float support >> isn't available. OK for trunk? > > It looks like these are testing for particular instructions using FPRs and > so powerpc_fprs is more appropriate; you don't want to match e500v2 hard > float.
Is a patch using powerpc_fprs instead of hard_float OK for these tests? Janis