On 20/10/17 13:45, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Oct 19, 2017, "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <richard.earns...@arm.com> > wrote: > >> On 19/10/17 09:14, Richard Biener wrote: >>> I guess Alex work on stmt frontiers will fix this instance? > >> Don't stmt frontiers just enable you to identify exactly one stopping >> point with each statement, so that you don't keep repeatedly stepping to >> the same line? > > There's that, but such stopping points are also ordered WRT debug bind > stmts, so that when you stop at such a recommended point, you observe > the expected side effects. >
How do you ensure that if all the instructions from statement2 are scheduled before any of the instructions from statement1? R. > -- > Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ > You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi > Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member > Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer