On 20/10/17 13:45, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2017, "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <richard.earns...@arm.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 19/10/17 09:14, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> I guess Alex work on stmt frontiers will fix this instance?
> 
>> Don't stmt frontiers just enable you to identify exactly one stopping
>> point with each statement, so that you don't keep repeatedly stepping to
>> the same line?
> 
> There's that, but such stopping points are also ordered WRT debug bind
> stmts, so that when you stop at such a recommended point, you observe
> the expected side effects.
> 

How do you ensure that if all the instructions from statement2 are
scheduled before any of the instructions from statement1?

R.

> -- 
> Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
> You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
> Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
> Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer

Reply via email to