Ping
________________________________________
From: Tamar Christina
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 1:45:18 PM
To: Christophe Lyon
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd; James Greenhalgh; Richard Earnshaw; Marcus
Shawcroft
Subject: Re: [PATCH][GCC][ARM][AArch64] Testsuite framework changes and
execution tests [Patch (8/8)]
Hi All,
this is a minor respin of the patch with the comments addressed. Note this
patch is now 7/8 in the series.
Regtested on arm-none-eabi, armeb-none-eabi,
aarch64-none-elf and aarch64_be-none-elf with no issues found.
Ok for trunk?
gcc/testsuite
2017-10-06 Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
* lib/target-supports.exp
(check_effective_target_arm_v8_2a_dotprod_neon_ok_nocache): New.
(check_effective_target_arm_v8_2a_dotprod_neon_ok): New.
(add_options_for_arm_v8_2a_dotprod_neon): New.
(check_effective_target_arm_v8_2a_dotprod_neon_hw): New.
(check_effective_target_vect_sdot_qi): New.
(check_effective_target_vect_udot_qi): New.
* gcc.target/arm/simd/vdot-exec.c: New.
* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vdot-exec.c: New.
* gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi: Document arm_v8_2a_dotprod_neon.
________________________________________
From: Tamar Christina
Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 2:01:40 PM
To: Christophe Lyon
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd; James Greenhalgh; Richard Earnshaw; Marcus
Shawcroft
Subject: RE: [PATCH][GCC][ARM][AArch64] Testsuite framework changes and
execution tests [Patch (8/8)]
Hi Christophe,
> >
> > gcc/testsuite
> > 2017-09-01 Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
> >
> > * lib/target-supports.exp
> > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_2a_dotprod_neon_ok_nocache):
> New.
> > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_2a_dotprod_neon_ok): New.
> > (add_options_for_arm_v8_2a_dotprod_neon): New.
> > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_2a_dotprod_neon_hw): New.
> > (check_effective_target_vect_sdot_qi): New.
> > (check_effective_target_vect_udot_qi): New.
> > * gcc.target/arm/simd/vdot-exec.c: New.
>
> Aren't you defining twice P() and ARR() in vdot-exec.c ?
> I'd expect a preprocessor error, did I read too quickly?
>
Yes they are defined twice but they're not redefined, all the definitions
are exactly the same so the pre-processor doesn't care. I can leave only
one if this is confusing.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christophe
>
> > * gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vdot-exec.c: New.
> > * gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi: Document arm_v8_2a_dotprod_neon.
> >
> > --
