On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 12:35 -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 10/26/2017 11:47 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > Thanks you for fleshing this out, Jim! > > > > This looks fine to me (modula Sandra's note). Just a question: > > would > > we refer to GDB instead of gdb here? It feels a little in between > > to > > me, whether we are referring to the tool or the actual binary. I'm > > sure Sandra will have guidance for us. ;-) > Hmmm, yes. "GDB" is the preferred spelling elsewhere in the manual.
Checked in with the two corrections. Jim
