On 10/13/11 06:15:31, Laurynas Biveinis wrote: > [...] In your case (correct me if I misunderstood something) > you have one hash table, marking of which will mark more objects > which are required for the correct marking of the second hash table. > GC might be simply walking the second one first.
Yes, I think that this accurately summarizes the situation, and the result. Any suggestions on how to fix this? It seems that one fix might be to use a non garbage-collected hash table for the hash map. - Gary