> If one wants a 32-bit default compiler, they should build for the > sparc-linux target. And this is absolutely trivial to make happen > in the environments where this is supposedly a problem.
I have criticized so many times this combination in the past, while Jakub and also you IIRC were defending it, that I find it a bit strange that the table have been turned like that... > We could allow it for compatability, but I'd prefer not to. I beg to differ though. Breaking backward compatibility should be the last resort solution; restoring it in this case appears to be totally harmless. -- Eric Botcazou
